Page 51 - SEN107 SEN Magazine July-August 2020
P. 51

Research on the impact of class sizes on the emotional well-  being of children was carried out in two schools of similar size.   One school had large class sizes (30+) and the other had class   sizes that didn’t go above 20. Both schools were in areas of   high deprivation. The research indicated that on the surface,   smaller class sizes had a positive impact on the mental health   of teachers and the overall happiness and emotional well-being   of the children.   The children in the smaller classes indicated that they were   significantly happier than the children in the larger class sizes   in relation to their attitude towards how much choice they have   in life, the way that they use their time, their relationships with   their peers and how happy they feel in school. The children’s   happiness was measured on a 10-point scale and the children   in larger classes had an average score of 7.75 and the children   in the smaller classes had an average of 9.08. This indicated   that overall (on average) all the children in both schools scored   as being ‘happy’ on the 10-point scale. This works on a basis   of anything above 6 means that they are ‘happy’ as set by the   Children’s Society (2018) who designed the questionnaire.   However, according to the overall data, the children in the   smaller class size indicated that they were happier than   the children in larger class sizes. However, this needs to be   considered with caution as other factors need to be taken into   consideration when assessing a child’s happiness rather than   assuming that these differences are purely due to class sizes.   Home and social factors are also clearly influential factors to   be considered.   Although the children in the smaller class size indicated   that they much preferred to be in a smaller class (98%), the   majority of the children in the larger class size did not appear   to believe they were at a disadvantage. This is because when   they were asked about their preferred class size, 63% of   them chose a class size of above 20 . However, the validity   of this could be questioned as they were being asked to   speculate on how they might feel in a class size that they hadn’t    experienced themselves.   Both the research and literature suggest that certain conditions   are more likely to provide a greater impact as a result of a   smaller class size. This includes the deprivation index of the   school and the age of the children. Literature indicates that   schools in more deprived areas might see better gains than   those in affluent areas.   An online questionnaire was completed by 200 primary school   teachers and concluded that children in Foundation, KS1 and   Year 6 were perceived by teachers to have greater emotional   needs and therefore are likely to benefit more emotionally as   a result of small class sizes than other year groups. It also   concluded that 89% of teachers prefer smaller class sizes and   think it enables them to provide better quality emotional support   for their children. The strong link between pupil outcomes and   teacher’s mental health could mean that this in itself could be   a strategy to support the emotional well-being of children.   A happy teacher equals happy children. It could also be a   strategy to overcome the problem of recruitment and retention   of teachers.   It would be naïve to think that we can overcome the emotional   repercussions of the pandemic by just putting the children in   a smaller class size. In fact, 99% of teachers thought that a   child’s home life was the most important factor in determining   a child’s mental health. The planning and delivery of lessons is   still paramount and the way in which teachers teach must be   changed in line with the reduction of the class size. The quality   of the staff employed needs to be addressed. Employing a   teacher of poor quality just to have a smaller class size could   in fact have a negative impact. The quality and experience   of teachers should not be jeopardised for the sake of having   more teachers and smaller class sizes. The importance of the   relationships between teachers, children and parents when   thinking about how best to support emotional well-being is also   a priority as well as the curriculum and ethos within the school.   Teachers need training to know how to identify that a child   might be experiencing difficulties with their emotional well-  being. They also need to be taught techniques and strategies   to support these children. This might include knowing when   to refer for specialist support when required.   Smaller class sizes could be one strategy to overcome the   emotional aftermath of Coronavirus, but it is one of a number   of different strategies that needs to be explored. Budget   constraints can also make it not financially viable.   It is important that we don’t just assume that the same child   will be returning to school in the same state of emotional well-  being after such an overwhelming and life changing event as the   Coronavirus pandemic. Schools and teachers need to be ready   with open arms and strategies to rise to the challenge.    About the author  Louise Connolly   is the principal   of The Sir Donald Bailey   Academy.  sirdonaldbailey.co.uk  Some children return to schools   with signs of emotional trauma  senmagazine.co.uk  SEN  107  51  COVID-19


































































































   49   50   51   52   53